Projects
RBC GICs
Case Study: Designing clarity and confidence in low-risk investing
At Royal Bank of Canada, the GIC experience needed to serve a broad range of users from first-time investors to experienced savers, while clearly explaining product types, terms, interest structures, and eligibility across multiple account types. As the Content Designer for this experience, I led the content strategy and UX writing for the GIC product page and the end-to-end process in the authenticated space, focusing on simplifying financial complexity, improving comprehension, and supporting confident decision-making.
The Challenge
GICs are conceptually simple but information-heavy in practice. Users needed to understand:
- What a GIC is and how it works
- How interest is earned and paid
- Differences between GIC types (fixed, variable, market-linked)
- Term lengths, liquidity restrictions, and risk levels
- How CDIC protection applies
- Which option best fits their savings goals
The challenge was to create a digital experience that simplified complex financial concepts without losing accuracy, supported quick scanning and comparison, built trust in a low-risk investment product, reduced cognitive load in decision-making, and balanced marketing, education, and compliance requirements.
My Role - Content Designer
Responsibilities included: content strategy and structuring, UX writing and plain-language rewriting, information architecture and content hierarchy, collaboration with product, legal, compliance, and design teams, accessibility and readability optimization, and content governance and consistency across investment pages.
Research and Insights
1. Users want reassurance before details. Most users first ask: "Is my money safe?" before engaging with product features.
2. Complexity creates hesitation. Terms like "market-linked," "interest escalation," and "redemption restrictions" often created confusion or delay in decision-making.
3. Comparison is a key behaviour. Users frequently compare GIC types and terms before committing, especially around flexibility vs. return.
These insights shaped a content strategy focused on clarity, hierarchy, and progressive disclosure.
Content Strategy
1. Led with safety and simplicity: The page was structured to immediately establish principal protection, guaranteed returns (depending on product type), and the low-risk nature of GICs. This built trust before introducing complexity.
2. Organize content by user decision-making needs: Instead of structuring content by product taxonomy alone, I organized it around how users evaluate GICs: What it is (definition and purpose), Why it matters (benefits and security), How it works (interest, terms, payout options), and Which type to choose (product family breakdown). This aligned content with real user decision paths.
3. Simplify financial language: I reduced cognitive load by rewriting banking jargon into plain language, converting feature-heavy descriptions into benefit-led statements, using short sections and scannable formatting, and standardizing terminology across investment content. Example: From "interest rate-linked returns based on Prime rate fluctuations" to "a variable rate that changes when the Prime rate changes."
4. Improve comparison clarity: Because users often compare GIC types, I introduced clearer separation between Guaranteed-return GICs, Interest rate-linked GICs, and Equity-linked GICs. Each section was structured consistently to support easy scanning and mental comparison.
5. Balance compliance with usability: I collaborated closely with compliance teams to ensure required disclosures remained intact, risk language was accurate and visible, simplification did not remove critical meaning, and tone remained consistent across regulated content.
Outcomes
The redesigned GIC content experience helped:
- Improve clarity of complex investment concepts
- Enable faster user comprehension of product differences
- Support more confident self-directed decision-making
- Strengthen consistency across RBC investment content
- Reduce friction in early-stage consideration journeys
By reframing GICs through a user-first lens, the experience shifted from a dense product explanation to a guided educational decision tool.
Key Skills Demonstrated
- Content Design
- UX Writing
- Information Architecture
- Financial Services Content Strategy
- Plain Language Writing
- Accessibility
- Cross-functional Collaboration
- Compliance-Aware Content Design
- Decision Journey Mapping
Royal Business OperatingLine (RBOL)
Designing clarity, control, and confidence in business cash flow management
The Royal Business OperatingLine of Credit is a core financing product designed to help Canadian businesses manage day-to-day cash flow, cover operating gaps, and access flexible working capital as needed. The digital experience needed to communicate a complex revolving credit product in a way that was simple, intuitive, and trustworthy for small to mid-sized business owners, many of whom are time-poor and financially risk-sensitive. As the Content Designer for this experience, I led the content strategy and UX writing to make a highly technical financial product easier to understand, easier to access, and easier to act on.
The Challenge
Business lines of credit are inherently complex financial instruments. Users needed to understand:
- How the operating line works in real time
- How funds move between accounts automatically
- Differences between one-way and two-way revolving options
- How interest is calculated and when it applies
- How the credit line supports cash flow gaps
- What access channels are available (online, mobile, ATM, branch)
However, the existing content risked overwhelming users with dense financial terminology, operational banking language (e.g., "revolving funds arrangement"), long compliance disclosures embedded within key messages, and unclear mental models of how money moves between accounts. The challenge was to translate a highly technical banking product into a clear, user-centered experience that supported confident decision-making.
My Role - Content Designer
Responsibilities included: content strategy and information architecture, UX writing and plain-language rewriting, structuring complex financial flows into understandable narratives, collaboration with product, legal, compliance, and UX teams, ensuring regulatory accuracy while improving usability, and accessibility and readability optimization.
User Insights
1. Cash flow clarity over product detail. Business owners primarily want to know: "Will this help me cover short-term cash gaps?"
2. Fear of complexity. Users often perceive credit products as risky or difficult to control, especially when automation is involved.
3. Need for control and transparency. Users want confidence in how money moves between accounts and when borrowing occurs.
These insights shaped a strategy focused on clarity, transparency, and reduced cognitive load.
Content Strategy
1. Lead with business value, not financial mechanics: The content prioritizes real-world use cases: covering cash flow gaps, supporting business growth, and managing operating expenses. This ensures users immediately understand relevance before encountering technical detail.
2. Simplify how the product works: To improve clarity, I broke system behaviour into simple cause-and-effect explanations, replaced banking jargon with plain-language descriptions, explained automation in user-centred terms, and used step-based structure to explain how money moves between accounts.
3. Structure content around user mental models: Instead of organizing content purely by product features, I structured it around how users think: What it is for, How it works, How to access funds, Key benefits and flexibility, and Important details. This reduced cognitive friction and improved scanning.
4. Make automation feel transparent, not opaque: Automated transfers can feel risky if not clearly explained. I focused on explaining triggers for fund movement, clarifying direction of transfers, reinforcing user control and predictability, and avoiding overly technical terms like "revolving funds arrangement" in primary messaging.
5. Balance compliance with usability: I collaborated closely with legal and compliance teams to preserve required financial definitions, simplify language without altering meaning, ensure disclosures were accurate and appropriately placed, and maintain consistency across business lending products.
Outcomes
The redesigned content experience improved:
- Clarity of how the operating line functions in real business scenarios
- Understanding of automated fund transfers and repayment behavior
- Confidence in using revolving credit as a cash flow tool
- Navigation across complex product details
- Alignment between business value messaging and financial mechanics
Overall, the experience helped transform a complex lending product into a clearer, more transparent financial tool for business owners.
Key Skills Demonstrated
- Content Design
- UX Writing
- Information Architecture
- Financial Services Content Strategy
- Plain Language Writing
- Systems Thinking
- Compliance-Aware Content Design
- User Journey Mapping
- Accessibility
- Cross-functional Collaboration
RBC Mortgage Renewals
Case Study: Simplifying Mortgage Renewal Decision-Making for RBC Clients
Mortgage renewal is one of the most important financial decision moments for homeowners, yet it is often experienced as confusing, high-stakes, and fragmented across channels. This project focused on redesigning and refining the content for RBC Royal Bank's "Renewing your mortgage" experience to help customers confidently understand what renewal means, what choices they have, and how to take action, whether online, through mobile banking, or with an advisor. The primary content challenge was not a lack of information, but too much complexity, inconsistency, and anxiety-inducing ambiguity across mortgage education, renewal steps, and decision support.
The Challenge
1. High anxiety and low confidence: Customers approaching renewal often felt unsure what "renewal" actually changes, concerned about rising interest rates, and confused about whether they needed to reapply or requalify.
2. Fragmented information: Content was previously spread across renewal instructions, educational mortgage explanations, rate and product information, and advisor and support pathways. This forced users to "self-assemble" answers across multiple pages.
3. Decision paralysis: Users struggled to compare fixed vs variable considerations at renewal, early renewal vs waiting to maturity, and online vs advisor-assisted renewal paths. The content lacked a clear hierarchy of "what matters most right now."
Goals
The content design goals were:
- Reduce cognitive load during a high-stress financial moment
- Clarify what renewal is (and is not) in simple language
- Make next steps obvious and actionable
- Support multiple user paths (DIY digital vs advisor-assisted)
- Reinforce trust through transparency and plain language
Content Design Approach
1. Structuring content around user intent, not bank systems: Instead of organizing content by internal banking processes, the page was redesigned around user questions: "What happens when I renew?", "Do I need to requalify?", "How do I renew online?", "What are my options if my payment increases?", "How early can I renew?" This shift helped reduce cognitive friction by aligning with real user mental models.
2. Layered information architecture: Layer 1 (Core explanation): What mortgage renewal is, why it happens, what changes at renewal. Layer 2 (Decision support): Fixed vs variable renewal implications, early renewal considerations, payment impact explanation. Layer 3 (Task completion): Step-by-step renewal instructions (online and mobile), advisor contact options, tools and calculators. This allowed users to either skim for action or go deeper for understanding.
3. Plain language and emotional clarity: I rewrote the initial mortgage renewals language to reduce intimidation. Before: "You will need to select a new term, interest type, and rate product at maturity." After: "At renewal, you choose a new term and interest rate for your mortgage." I also explicitly addressed anxiety triggers: confirming users do not need to reapply or requalify, explaining why payments may change, and normalizing uncertainty around rates.
4. Designing for multiple decision paths: Instead of forcing a single best path, the content supports self-serve users (complete renewal online or in app), guided users (explore calculators and recommendations), and high-uncertainty users (connect with an advisor). Each path is presented equally, reducing perceived bias toward digital-only completion.
5. Embedding reassurance within tasks: Key reassurance moments were intentionally embedded near decision points: before renewal steps: "No reapplication required"; before rate explanation: "Your rate depends on current market conditions"; before affordability concerns: "Options exist if payments increase." This reduces drop-off caused by fear or uncertainty.
Key Content Decisions
Decision 1: Prioritizing "what changes" over technical definitions. We reduced mortgage terminology depth in favor of practical implications: payment impact, rate change expectations, and term selection implications.
Decision 2: Combining education and action in one page. Rather than separating "learn" vs "do," the page integrates explanations directly above interactive tools and FAQs next to renewal actions.
Decision 3: Making advisor support feel accessible, not escalated. Advisor contact is framed as a normal option, not a "last resort," and as part of the decision process, not failure to self-serve.
Outcomes
While exact metrics vary by release cycle, expected outcomes of this content approach include:
- Reduced drop-off on renewal entry pages
- Increased self-serve completion via online/mobile tools
- Fewer support calls related to basic renewal questions
- Higher user confidence in selecting renewal terms
- Improved clarity in "do I need to requalify?" comprehension
Learnings
1. Renewal is not a transactional moment, it is a decision moment. Users are not just executing a task; they are actively evaluating risk, affordability, and timing.
2. Clarity beats completeness. Users do not need every mortgage detail, they need the right detail at the right time.
3. Anxiety is a content problem, not just a financial one. Much of renewal friction comes from uncertainty, not complexity alone.
4. Multiple pathways reduce abandonment. Supporting both self-serve and advisor-assisted journeys increases trust and completion.
Conclusion
This content redesign reframed mortgage renewal from a procedural banking task into a guided decision experience. By prioritizing clarity, reassurance, and task-oriented structure, the page helps customers move from uncertainty to confident action, on their own terms.